From the AEGIS e-Journal, Volume 8 Number 5, May 2005
Defensive Use of Firearms Stephen P Wenger Paladin Press ISBN: 978-1-58160-469-6 120 pages $20.00 http://www.paladin-press.com/ 1-303-443-7250 Since we discussed a defensive-ish incident earlier in this issue, it seems a good time to talk about Defensive Use of Firearms, which was written by someone known to us. It also seemed a good time to discuss our view on use of guns, which will provide a background for the book. Guns are wildly popular here in the United States. We have more guns than automobiles, more than half of all households have guns in them. Shooting sports are very popular, with more people engaging in shooting sports than in playing tennis. There are 17 Olympic shooting events, and a host of non- Olympic events available to competitors. Shooting sports – particularly handgun competitions – are growing popular among women, largely because shooting is fun, but also because it involves fine-motor skills, and, as a group, women generally have better fine-motor skills than men. Shooting also requires relatively little upper-body strength, and, as a group, women generally have upper-body strength than do men. Guns are also widely used for self-defense in our more-violent-than-most culture, and we have seen convincing estimates of a defensive use every 13 seconds (in the overwhelming majority of cases, the gun never fired). In general, if a gun is needed for self-defense –that is to say if someone is actively trying to kill you – there exists no other emergency safety tool that will adequately stand in its place. The downside to guns is, of course, gun homicide and accidental deaths, particularly the tragic accidental gun deaths of children. Astonishingly, these are so rare as not to be much of a statistically realistic concern. In the last year of record, out of 2,437,583 deaths in the U.S, there were a only 10,131 murders and non-negligent homicides involving firearms. There are about a thousand accidental gun deaths a year (mostly, it appears, involving hunters), of which roughly 110 deaths – two per state per year – are tragic ÆGIS, May 2005 11 accidental gun deaths of children. This is a figure so low as to not allow amelioration through social policy or law. From a societal point of view, we believe the benefits of civilian gun ownership compensates for the firearms homicides and accidents. And that there is a benefit to having some number of people carrying guns concealed on their person, as it creates enough uncertainty in the minds of criminals as to cause them to move to property crimes rather than crimes against the person. But it only takes a small number of people owning guns and carrying concealed weapons to induce this uncertainty. Do we ourselves keep and carry guns for self-protection? No. Do we have our protective people carry them? In general, other than in quasi-military situations, no, as we want agents to feel more like rabbits than lions, and make every effort to anticipate and avoid problems, and to run away from problems if they occur, taking the people under their care with them. Should you own a gun for self-protection? That is a personal choice, and we frankly have no strong feeling about it one way or the other, assuming that there is no troubled teenager in the house who might be suicidal, or anyone else, for that matter, who might be suicidal, in which case we have a strong feeling against. While the absence of a gun will not reduce the likelihood of a suicide, it will markedly reduce the likelihood of a suicide with your gun! If you do keep a gun for personal protection – if you have made the decision that, in certain circumstances, you would be willing to take the life of another human being – we feel very strongly that you should know how to use the gun responsibly and effectively. Knowing how to use a gun has two parts. The first part is the general gun safety part and operating mechanics part, for which we think training is the best way to learn. Note that accident rates and rates of misuse of guns do not differ between states that have a mandatory requirement for training and those that do not. What we are looking for is not fulfillment of a meaningless legal requirement, but, rather, for a voluntary commitment to safety on the part of the gun owner who might need to take a life if there is no other option available. The second part is training in use of the gun, which includes the mechanics of making the gun work effectively for the purpose of protection of life. This last part is the kicker: Training that works for one use may not transfer to another. Thus, we, ourselves, train for Olympic-style competitions, for police-style competitions, and for the kind of shooting one might need in the ÆGIS, May 2005 12 work we do professionally. None of the training we do for each of these specialties is necessarily related to the skills needed for the other specialties, and certainly not for defensive use by private citizens. For those interested in self-defense, you need to build a sure knowledge of when and where you can and cannot use an emergency safety tool, as well as to develop both appropriate tactics and strategies that will allow you to survive. And, finally, you need to develop the ability to shoot under stress and actually hit whomever you are aiming at, and not anyone else. Besides training, you will want to read a lot about self-defense in general and shooting in particular, as is appropriate for a commitment to take the life of another human being. Which brings us to Defensive Use of Firearms. While not written for the beginning shooter, Defensive Use of Firearms has been put together by someone who has spent a lot of time studying shooting, and training in shooting, and teaching shooting. It covers a wide variety of subjects, starting with an excellent review of safety issues. For the experienced shooter interested in using a gun for self-defense, it gives another set of options to consider. For those new to defensive shooting, it gives some tips you might not have considered unless you are either well trained or spend a lot of time thinking about unlikely events. As an example, many shooting classes talk about “double taps,” where you fire two rapid shots at the person you are trying to stop, or triple taps, where you fire two shots to center of mass and a third to the head. This is a good thing to do with a single opponent, as handgun bullets – even big ones – are pretty small, and two hits increase the likelihood of making someone who is trying to kill you stop. HOWEVER, if you are facing multiple opponents, double or triple taps are a very bad idea indeed, because by the time you finish with the first or second bad guy, the last in the row might well have shot you. So in this case you need to take one shot at each of your opponents (most people don’t like to be shot at, so this disconcerts them greatly), and when you are finished with the last of them you start back at the beginning. Assimilating this sort of knowledge is important, because until you do a lot of when-then thinking (when this happens, then I will do that), you are likely to end up in a situation that you have not only not practiced-for, but never even thought about. And when you are in a situation for which you are unprepared, you are likely to do – nothing. This is why people in the business of staying alive when others are likely to try to kill them are always running when-then scenarios in their minds, thinking “When I am on a train and hear shooting in the next car, then I will…” or “When I open my front ÆGIS, May 2005 13 door and there is a bad guy standing there with a spanner, then I will…” or “When I pause before entering a store or office and bank, and see everyone frozen in place, then I will…” or “When I am sitting an a restaurant, squished in among my family on the banquette, and some crazy person bursts in and starts shooting, then I will…” or “When I am in a parking lot with my precious six year old daughter, and a robber holding a gun bursts out of a store and runs for his car, then I will…” Defensive Use of Firearms is well organized and concise, with seven chapters: Safety with Firearms (8 pages) Mental Awareness (4 Pages) Mental Preparedness (6 pages) Tactics (19 pages) Skills (30 pages) Equipment (22 pages) Legal Issues (4 pages). These seven touch on most of the areas you need to be thinking about if you contemplate using a gun for self-defense (it is lacking a chapter on how you, the defender, deal with the after-effects of a violent encounter). Each chapter has information of potential value to you, and each chapter will indicate areas in which you need to do additional research and reading. 7. Subscription/Unsubscription/Copyright Information •• ÆGIS is supported and maintained by voluntary efforts. This publication is owned, published, and copyright © 2005 by The LUBRINCO Group Ltd, Inc. and Financial Examinations and Evaluations, Inc. It is edited jointly by Richard Isaacs (RBIsaacs@lubrinco.com) and L. Burke Files (LBFiles@feeinc.com). LUBRINCO provides services in three high-threat areas, too specialized to be dealt-with in-house, that can adversely affect domestic and international bottom lines. • Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 OPSEC compliance. 1. American businesses lose $300 billion annually to competitive intelligence, economic espionage, and information theft. 2. Sarbanes-Oxley requires internal controls tracking the costs, and impact on valuation, of competitive intelligence, economic espionage, and information theft. ÆGIS, May 2005 14 o LUBRINCO provides private sector access to OPSEC, the government-standard process for identification, valuation, and protection of intellectual property and critical information from competitive intelligence, economic espionage, and information theft. • International asset location and due diligence. o Location of concealed assets in fraud, theft, and divorce. o Due diligence to prevent fraud and loss in China, Central and Eastern Europe, Central Asia, the offshore financial centers, Latin America, the Caribbean. o Financial fraud and anti-money laundering program development and training for compliance with the US International Money Laundering Abatement and Anti-Terrorist Financing Act of 2001 and the EU Revised Money Laundering Directive of 2001. • Protection of management, staff, and families. o In the high-threat environments of Latin America, Africa, the Mid- East, and Southeast Asia. o When traveling and living overseas. o When transporting items of substantial value. LUBRINCO identifies and quantifies threats and vulnerabilities, and their associated risk, then manages the vulnerabilities so you can transfer or live with the residual risk. We prevent disastrous financial loss to your company, and physical harm to you, your family, and your staff. For information on LUBRINCO and its services, or for the archive of all past issues of ÆGIS in PDF format, please go to http://www.lubrinco.com/. Subscription to ÆGIS is available for $15 per year in North America and $20 per year outside of North America. To sign up for a complimentary subscription to ÆGIS or the ÆGIS PDF notification list, go to http://lb.bcentral.com/ex/manage/subscriberprefs?customerid=7768 or send an email to aegis@lubrinco.com. To subscribe to our AvantGo channel, go to http://avantgo.com/channels/_add_channel.pl?cha_id=1773 To be removed from the subscription list, follow the instructions on the mailing you received, or send an e-mail to aegis@lubrinco.com. ÆGIS, May 2005 15 If you know of anyone else who should be receiving ÆGIS, please send their e-mail address to aegis@lubrinco.com. If there is a topic that you would like to know more about, send it to aegis@lubrinco.com and the editors will consider it as the topic for an article in an upcoming issue. If you would like to submit an article for publication in ÆGIS, send it as an attachment to an e-mail to aegis@lubrinco.com. Submission of an article certifies that (a) all information in the article is in the public record, or (b) that you are authorized to release any personal or corporate proprietary information contained in the article, and (c) that none of the article has previously been copyrighted. The submission of materials for publication in ÆGIS constitutes a license to LUBRINCO, and/or Financial Examinations and Evaluations, Inc, their assigns, associates, or affiliates, to abridge and/or edit said submission, and to copyright and publish/republish any submitted materials in whatever written and/or electronic form they may choose. If you would like to go beyond normal fair-use in reproducing articles from this issue of ÆGIS, you may do so freely as long as appropriate source, copyright, accreditation, and link to the LUBRINCO Web site is included. This should be in the form
Article Title, from the May 2005 ÆGIS (© 2005 LUBRINCO & FEE), to be found at http://www.lubrinco.com/. ÆGIS is a forum for the exchange of information, ideas, operating styles, theories, and related topics for corporate managers who make decisions about threats typically outside the expertise available in-house, yet which have the potential to affect their company’s domestic and international bottom lines. Nothing appearing in ÆGIS should be construed as legal advice. The information provided is “general information,” not “specific advice.” The solution to any problem is highly dependent upon the precise facts involved. Thus, before making any reliance upon anything said here, you should consult with an appropriately skilled professional. Opinions expressed by contributors are not necessarily endorsed by the publisher, and may be presented to encourage a dialogue among subscribers. The publisher and any re-publisher cannot be held responsible for any loss incurred as a result of the application of any information published in ÆGIS. Please be safe, and be smart.